The engagement problem no one wants to admit

Here’s the other dirty little secret: most managers don’t engage with the content. In Blify’s interviews with over 40 L&D leaders, a recurring theme emerged: “We bought a premium catalog, promoted it company-wide… but no one logs in.”

Why? Because most programs assume managers are willing and available to learn on their own, ignoring real-world constraints like cognitive overload, deadline pressure, and role isolation.

A Deloitte benchmark found that in companies where leadership training is offered as “on-demand,” only 12% of managers use it regularly. But in companies where microlearning is embedded into daily tools (like Slack or Teams), usage jumps to 63%. The difference? It’s not the content—it’s the context.

Zoom calls and mentorship aren’t enough

Some vendors have tried to fix this by layering in synchronous sessions—monthly Zoom calls, peer coaching, virtual classrooms. Sounds good. But it often misses the mark.

Why? Because these sessions rarely connect to actual on-the-job challenges. They’re abstract, loosely structured, and disconnected from daily team issues. There’s no roleplay. No real feedback. No safe space to practice difficult conversations.

As educational researcher David Kolb showed, long-term learning happens through a cycle of “experience – reflection – conceptualization – experimentation.” How many online programs let a manager replay a real scenario from yesterday and get expert coaching on it? Very few. And that’s the problem.

Where’s the ROI?

Let’s talk about money. Most online management programs come with snazzy analytics: completion rates, feedback scores, user satisfaction. But hard results? Much harder to come by.

How do you measure whether a manager improved their communication? Or managed a conflict more effectively? Or made better hiring decisions? Without behavioral indicators or real-time observations, most L&D teams fly blind.

As McKinsey pointed out in its “How to Improve the Impact of Training” report, 70% of learning leaders admit they don’t know whether their training drives actual performance. That’s a problem—especially when budgets are tight and business impact matters more than ever.

It’s time to shift the paradigm

Let’s be clear: the solution isn’t better content or a shinier LMS. It’s a complete rethinking of how managers learn at work. They don’t need yet another course. They need tools to act better, now.

This means designing online team management training that’s:

• Contextualized: personalized to the manager’s real-world challenges and company culture.

• Individualized: dynamically adapted to their level, style, and current needs.

• Embedded: accessible directly in their flow of work—not on a disconnected platform.

• Actionable: based on practice, not theory, with real scenarios and simulated conversations.

That’s the path Blify is building: AI-powered, in-the-flow of work training that meets managers where they are, with personalized roleplay and decision-making practice. No more theory. Just impact.

——

FAQ

To find out more, here are some answers to your main questions...

Why is online team management training often ineffective?
Because it’s usually generic, disconnected from real work situations, and rarely adapted to the learner’s current needs.

Can e-learning be effective for managers?
Yes—if it’s contextual, practical, and embedded into everyday workflows. Otherwise, it’s just another task on the to-do list.

How can companies improve the ROI of their digital leadership training?
By focusing on active practice, real-time feedback, and behavior change—not just knowledge delivery.

Are there alternatives to traditional LMS-based programs?
Yes. Solutions like Blify use AI to generate tailored simulations and roleplays, enabling managers to learn in action—not in isolation.